Legistar header
                                                         
File #: PH-22-033    Version: 1 Name: FLUM 22-13
Type: Ordinance/Public Hearing Status: Passed
File created: 3/11/2022 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/10/2022 Final action: 5/10/2022
Title: HOLD a public hearing and consider an ordinance requested by Eugene Kim on behalf of G3 JS Investments, LLC (Case #FLUM 22-13) to amend the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from a 'General Residential' (GR) designation to a 'General Commercial' (GC) designation for approximately 4.289 acres out of the A. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 813. The property is locally addressed as 905 W. Hallmark Avenue, Killeen, Texas.
Sponsors: Development Services
Attachments: 1. Maps, 2. Minutes, 3. Ordinance, 4. Presentation

Title

 

HOLD a public hearing and consider an ordinance requested by Eugene Kim on behalf of G3 JS Investments, LLC (Case #FLUM 22-13) to amend the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from a ‘General Residential’ (GR) designation to a ‘General Commercial’ (GC) designation for approximately 4.289 acres out of the A. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 813. The property is locally addressed as 905 W. Hallmark Avenue, Killeen, Texas.

 

Summary

 

DATE:                     May 3, 2022                     

 

TO:                     Kent Cagle, City Manager                     

 

FROM:                     Edwin Revell, Executive Director of Development Services                     

 

SUBJECT:                     FLUM CASE #22-13: ‘GENERAL RESIDENTIAL’ (GR) TO ‘GENERAL COMMERCIAL’ (GC)                     

 

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

 

Property Information:

 

Property Owner: G3 JS Investments, LLC

Agent: Eugene Kim

Current FLUM Designation: ‘General Residential’ (GR)

Requested FLUM Designation: ‘General Commercial’ (GC)

Current Zoning: “R-3” (Multifamily Residential District)

Proposed Zoning: “B-3” (Local Business District)

 

Summary of Request:

 

Eugene Kim, on behalf of G3 JS Investments, LLC, has submitted a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan’s Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from a ‘General Residential’ (GR) designation to a ‘General Commercial’ (GC) designation for approximately 4.289 acres out of the A. Thompson Survey, Abstract No. 813.  If approved, the applicant intends to develop the property as a shopping plaza for small to medium size stores, offices, restaurants, and cultural event spaces.

 

Zoning/Plat Case History:

 

The subject property was rezoned from “R-MH” (Residential Mobile Home District) and “B-5” (Business District) to R-3 (Multifamily) and B-3 (Local Business) via Ordinance No. 77-63 on November 8, 1977.  The property is currently unplatted.

 

Character of the Area:

 

North: Existing Mobile Home Park (Oak Springs Estates Mobile Home Park) zoned “R-MH” (Mobile Home District)

East: Existing single-family and two-family homes zoned “R-3” (Multifamily Residential District) and commercial property zoned “B-5” (Business District)

South: Existing commercial businesses zoned “B-5” (Business District)

West: Vacant commercial property zoned “RC-1” (Restaurant and Alcohol Sales District) and existing commercial business zoned “B-5” (Business District)

 

Future Land Use Map Analysis:

 

The subject property is designated as ‘General Residential (GR) on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Comprehensive Plan. The ‘General Residential’ (GR) designation encourages the following development types:

§                     Detached residential dwellings as a primary focus;

§                     Attached housing types subject to compatibility and open space standards (e.g., duplexes, townhomes, patio homes);

§                     Planned developments, potentially with a mix of housing types and varying densities, subject to compatibility and open space standards;

§                     Public/ institutional; and

§                     Parks and public spaces.

 

If approved, the ‘General Commercial’ (GC) designation encourages the following development types:

§                     Wide range of commercial retail and service uses, at varying scales and intensities;

§                     Office (both large and/or multi-story buildings and small-scale office uses);

§                     Public/institutional; and

§                     Parks and public spaces.

 

The applicant has submitted a concurrent request to rezone the portion of the property that is currently zoned as “R-3” (Multifamily Residential District) to “B-3” (Local Business District).

 

Water, Sewer and Drainage Services:

 

Provider: City of Killeen

Within Service Area: Yes

Feasibility Study or Service Commitment:  Water, sanitary sewer and drainage utility service is located within the City of Killeen municipal utility service area and available to the subject tract.

 

Transportation and Thoroughfare Plan:

 

Ingress and egress to the property is from W. Hallmark Ave., which is classified as a 110’ wide Minor Arterial on the City of Killeen Thoroughfare Plan.

 

Environmental Assessment:

 

The property is not within a FEMA regulatory Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA).  The property is crossed by Riverine habitat associated with the Hallmark Ditch, as identified on the National Wetlands Inventory.

 

 

Public Notification:

 

Staff mailed courtesy notices to thirty (30) surrounding property owners regarding this request.  Of those property owners notified, twelve (12) reside outside of Killeen. 

 

Staff Findings:

 

The subject property and its surrounding area are identified on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as being intended for ‘General Residential’ (GR) development and ‘General Commercial’ (GC) to the south. 

 

The character of the ‘General Residential’ (GR) land use category is auto‐oriented (especially where driveways and front‐loading garages dominate the front yard and building facades of homes), which can be offset by “anti‐monotony” architectural standards, landscaping, and limitations on “cookie cutter” subdivision layouts characterized by straight streets and uniform lot sizes and arrangement. Neighborhood‐scale commercial uses are expected to emerge over time and should be encouraged on sites and in locations within (or near the edge of) ‘GR’ areas that are best suited to accommodate such uses while ensuring compatibility with nearby residential uses.

 

The current zoning of the subject property is “B-3” (Local Business District) and “R-3” (Multifamily Residential District).  The surrounding area includes residential and commercial uses. 

 

THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

 

The City Council has three (3) alternatives.  The Council may:

§                     Disapprove the applicant’s FLUM amendment request;

§                     Approve a more restrictive FLUM designation; or

§                     Approve the applicant’s FLUM amendment request.

 

Which alternative is recommended? Why?

 

Staff recommends approval of the applicant’s request to amend the FLUM as presented.

 

Staff finds that the requested FLUM amendment is consistent with the existing commercial land uses adjacent to the subject property.  Further, staff finds that the proposed commercial use is compatible with the prevailing community character of the area.  The surrounding area includes a mix of commercial and residential land uses at varying scales and intensities.  Staff is of the determination that the proposed ‘General Commercial’ (GC) land use designation of the subject property would have no adverse impact on the surrounding area.

 

CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY:

 

This FLUM amendment request conforms to the City’s policy as detailed in the Comprehensive Plan.

 

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

 

What is the amount of the expenditure in the current fiscal year? For future years?

 

The proposed FLUM amendment does not involve the expenditure of City funds. 

 

Is this a one-time or recurring expenditure? 

 

This is not applicable.

 

Is this expenditure budgeted? 

 

This is not applicable.

 

If not, where will the money come from? 

 

This is not applicable.

 

Is there a sufficient amount in the budgeted line-item for this expenditure?

 

This is not applicable.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

At their regular meeting on April 4, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the applicant’s request by a vote of 7 to 0.

 

DEPARTMENTAL CLEARANCES:

 

This item has been reviewed by the Planning and Legal staff.

 

ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS:

 

Maps

Minutes

Ordinance