Legistar header
                                                         
File #: OR-21-023    Version: 1 Name: Ethics Ordinance
Type: Ordinance Status: Ordinances
File created: 9/14/2021 In control: City Council Workshop
On agenda: 9/21/2021 Final action:
Title: Consider an ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances Chapter 2, Administration, by adding Article VI, Ethics.
Sponsors: City Council, City Attorney Department
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Ordinance, 3. Presentation
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Title

Consider an ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances Chapter 2, Administration, by adding Article VI, Ethics.

Summary

DATE: September 21, 2021

TO: Kent Cagle, City Manager

FROM: Traci Briggs, City Attorney

SUBJECT: Adoption of an Ethics Ordinance

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

At the request of a Councilmember, the City Council discussed adopting an ethics ordinance, which the City currently does not have. The City Council gave staff direction to draft an ethics ordinance based on consensus reached on several key issues. On September 7, 2021, staff presented a draft ordinance. The City Council was given an opportunity to provide input to the City Attorney before the final ordinance was presented for consideration.

The attached ordinance reflects City Council changes to the draft made at its September 7 work session, including: 1) removal of the municipal court judges from those covered by the ethics ordinance; 2) deleting the proposed language on gifts and outside employment; and 3) clarifying that a relative of a city official as defined in the ordinance cannot serve on the Ethics Review Board.

Staff received comments back from Councilmembers since the September 7 work session, to include:
? excluding the City Manager and City Auditor from the ethics ordinance
? eliminating the creation of an Ethics Review Board
? consolidating all current ethics policies and codes of conduct into the ethics ordinance
? covering all staff with the ethics ordinance
? conducting background checks for committee members
? allowing a complainant to be unnamed and not required to testify if the complaint can be proven without the complainant testifying
? re-wording the section regarding frivolous complaints (2-177 in the attached draft) to app...

Click here for full text