Legistar header
                                                         
Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: RS-21-096    Version: 1 Name: Professional Service Agreement-Garver LLC
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 6/18/2021 In control: City Council
On agenda: 7/13/2021 Final action: 7/13/2021
Title: Consider a memorandum/resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with Garver, LLC, for construction administration/management of the Replacement of Terminal Capital Equipment System at Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport, in the amount of $200,000.
Sponsors: Aviation Department
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Agreement, 3. Certificate of Interested Parties, 4. Presentation
TITLE

Consider a memorandum/resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with Garver, LLC, for construction administration/management of the Replacement of Terminal Capital Equipment System at Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport, in the amount of $200,000.

SUMMARY

DATE: July 6, 2021

TO: Kent Cagle, City Manager

FROM: Mike Wilson, Executive Director of Aviation

SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement - Garver, LLC

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

On June 22, 2021, the City Council accepted a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grant for the replacement of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system at the Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport (KFHRA) terminal. The amount of the grant was $3,898,271, of which $400 is allocated for legal advertising, $3,693,871 for the construction contract, and $204,000 for construction administration/management services, and other associated costs.

Staff has negotiated a professional services agreement with Garver, LLC, in the amount of $200,000 for project administration services, construction administration services, on-site resident project representative services, and project closeout services. Garver, LLC was selected as the Aviation Department’s preferred general engineering and consultant firm through a competitive selection process in July of 2020.

THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Alternatives considered: (1) Disapprove the agreement, or (2) Approve the agreement.

Which alternative is recommended? Why?

Alternative 2 is recommended. The project is 100% funded by the AIP grant; and there is no impact on the Airport operating fund or fund balance.

CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY:

Yes

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

This project is funded 100% by an AIP Grant. There is no impact on the Airport operating fund or fund balance.

What is the amount of the expenditure in the current fiscal year? For future years?

The amount of the expenditures in the current year is $200,000.
...

Click here for full text