Legistar header
                                                         
File #: RS-21-066    Version: 1 Name: Deny Oncor DCRF application
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 4/26/2021 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/25/2021 Final action: 5/25/2021
Title: Consider a memorandum/resolution to deny a request by Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC to amend its Distribution Cost Recovery Factor, and to authorize the City’s participation with the Oncor Cities Steering Committee.
Sponsors: City Attorney Department
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Resolution, 3. Presentation
Title

Consider a memorandum/resolution to deny a request by Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC to amend its Distribution Cost Recovery Factor, and to authorize the City’s participation with the Oncor Cities Steering Committee.

Summary

DATE:                     May 18, 2021

TO:                     Kent Cagle, City Manager

FROM:                     Traci Briggs, City Attorney

SUBJECT:                     Denying Oncor Cost Distribution Cost Recovery Factor and authorizing participation in the Oncor Cities Steering Committee

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

Pursuant to state law, the city has regulatory authority over the rates and charges of electric utilities. The city participates as a member of the Oncor Cities Steering Committee (OCSC), a coalition of cities served by Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (Oncor) that works in an efficient and cost-effective manner to review and respond to electric issues affecting rates charged by Oncor before the Public Utility Commission (PUC) and in the courts.

On April 8, 2021, Oncor filed an Application for Approval to Amend its Distribution Cost Recovery Factor (DCRF) to increase distribution rates within each of the cities in its service area. In the filing, Oncor asserts that it is seeking a system-wide increase in total distribution revenue requirement by approximately $97,826,277.

PUC rules allow cities sixty (60) days to act once an application is filed. After a preliminary review of the application, OCSC attorneys recommend that the city deny the application and join with OCSC to further evaluate the filing, determine whether the filing complies with the law, and if lawful, determine the appropriate strategy to pursue, including a possible settlement. If denied, the current rates will not change while the application remains pending before the PUC.

THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The city’s options are:

1) do nothing, and the rates as to the city would be appealed directly to the PUC;

2) approve O...

Click here for full text