Legistar header
                                                         
File #: PH-18-014B    Version: 1 Name: Approve Spectrum litigation
Type: Resolution/Public Hearing Status: Passed
File created: 6/6/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 6/12/2018 Final action: 6/12/2018
Title: Consider a memorandum/resolution to join litigation against Spectrum to recover underpayment of cable services franchise fees.
Sponsors: City Attorney Department
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Presentation
TITLE

Consider a memorandum/resolution to join litigation against Spectrum to recover underpayment of cable services franchise fees.

SUMMARY

DATE: June 12, 2018

TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager

VIA: Kathy Davis, City Attorney

FROM: Traci Briggs, Deputy City Attorney

SUBJECT: Joining litigation against Spectrum to recover underpayment of cable services franchise fees.

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

Spectrum, as a cable service provider, is required to make state-law specific franchise payments to each city where it provides services, based on gross revenue it collects in that city. In 2017, thirty-three (33) cities joined together to hire NewGen Strategies to analyze franchise payment records for 2013-2017. It was determined that Spectrum excluded several categories of revenue from gross revenue resulting in lower franchise payments to the cities. For Killeen, the estimated underpayment for the period is $151,486.00. Those cities are now considering litigation against Spectrum to recover those payments.


THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The city can participate in the litigation in an attempt to potentially recover the unpaid cable services franchise fees, or the city can opt to not join the litigation.

Which alternative is recommended? Why?

Staff recommends joining the litigation. In addition to recovering money owed to the city, a secondary goal is to establish a proper method of accounting going forward with Spectrum.

CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY:

This action conforms to city policy and state law.


FINANCIAL IMPACT:

What is the amount of the expenditure in the current fiscal year? For future years?

The law firm of Lloyd Gosselink proposes to represent all interested cities and has prepared an estimated budget of $375,000 to take the case through trial. The will be divided among those cities that chose to participate based on the amount each city stands to recover. The city’s estimated allocation of costs is $25,237.50. There is potential for an offs...

Click here for full text