Legistar header
                                                         
File #: RS-18-024    Version: 1 Name: Trimmier Rd Widening Change Order #19
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 3/6/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/10/2018 Final action: 4/10/2018
Title: Consider a memorandum/resolution authorizing the execution of Change Order No. 19 to McLean Construction, Inc. for the Trimmier Road Widening Project.
Sponsors: Public Works Department, Transportation Division
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Change Order #19, 3. Change Order List, 4. Certificate of Interested Parties, 5. Presentation
Related files: RS-16-032, DS-17-111, RS-15-081, RS-17-124, RS-17-129, DS-17-075, RS-16-150, RS-18-012
TITLE

Consider a memorandum/resolution authorizing the execution of Change Order No. 19 to McLean Construction, Inc. for the Trimmier Road Widening Project.

SUMMARY

DATE: April 3, 2018

TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager

FROM: David A. Olson, Executive Director of Public Works

SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 19 TO MCLEAN CONSTRUCTION, INC, FOR THE TRIMMIER ROAD WIDENING PROJECT

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

On March 11, 2014 (CCMR 14-129R), City Council awarded a construction contract to McLean Construction, Inc. in the amount of $6,845,845.00 for the Trimmier Road Widening project. The Trimmier Road Widening project consists of the federally funded widening of Trimmier Road, and the locally funded widening of WS Young Drive, extension of Lowes Boulevard, and installation of Walmart Boulevard traffic signal. Change Order No. 19 represents the final reconciliation change order for the Trimmier Road portion of the projects. The reconciliation change order includes the project overruns and underruns, and balances to a net project credit of $304,889.73.

THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

(1) Reconcile the bid line items on the Trimmier Road portion of the project and process a final reduction in the project contract amount;
(2) Do not reconcile the bid line items and close the Trimmier Road portion of the project without reducing the contract amount. This process closes the project with an open balance and leaves room for questions during a future audit process.

Which alternative is recommended? Why?

City Staff recommends option 1 to reconcile the bid line items on the Trimmier Road portion of the project and process a final reduction in the project contract amount. This practice will be consistent with the practice on the project to date, and will reduce the likelihood of future questions during the final project audit process.

CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY:

This item conforms with state and ...

Click here for full text