Legistar header
                                                         
File #: RS-17-117    Version: 1 Name: Deed without warranty for 501 Lisa Lane
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 11/2/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 11/28/2017 Final action: 11/28/2017
Title: Consider a memorandum/resolution granting a deed without warranty to Tanja K. Robinson-Malone for property located at 501 Lisa Lane in Killeen, Texas, for property erroneously deeded to the City of Killeen.
Sponsors: City Attorney Department
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Draft Deed Without Warranty, 3. Presentation
TITLE

Consider a memorandum/resolution granting a deed without warranty to Tanja K. Robinson-Malone for property located at 501 Lisa Lane in Killeen, Texas, for property erroneously deeded to the City of Killeen.

SUMMARY

DATE: November 14, 2017

TO: Ronald L. Olson, City Manager

VIA: Kathy Davis, City Attorney

FROM: Traci Briggs, Deputy City Attorney

SUBJECT: Granting a deed without warranty to Tanja K. Robinson-Malone for property located at 501 Lisa Lane in Killeen, Texas for property erroneously deeded to the City of Killeen

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

By instrument number 2012-00053708, dated December 29, 2012, Tanja K. Robinson (now Robinson-Malone) erroneously deeded a single-family residence she owned at 501 Lisa Lane in Killeen to the City of Killeen. As staff understands it, Ms. Robinson married a veteran who was entitled to the veteran tax exemption. She apparently received bad advice from someone, and rather than deeding the property to her and her spouse, she deeded it to the city. This was done without the knowledge or consent of the city, and the city has no use for the property. Ms. Robinson-Malone is unable to correct the error without city action.

Because the city does not pay property taxes, no taxes have been assessed or collected since the conveyance. The Bell County Tax Appraisal District has confirmed that the taxes back to December 29, 2012, will be due from Ms. Robinson-Malone if the deed returning the property to her is dated back to the date of the original transfer.

The intent of this action is to reject the erroneous conveyance, deed the property back to Ms. Robinson-Malone and get the property back on the tax rolls.

THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The options are to reject the conveyance to the city and deed it back to Ms. Robinson-Malone, or to take no action.

Which alternative is recommended? Why?

Staff recommends rejecting the conveyance to the city and deeding it back to Ms. Robinson-Malone. While the Appraisal D...

Click here for full text