Legistar header
                                                         
File #: RS-17-028    Version: 1 Name: Audit Services
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 3/1/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 3/14/2017 Final action: 3/14/2017
Title: Consider a memorandum/resolution approving a professional services agreement with McConnell & Jones, LLP for audit services.
Sponsors: City Attorney Department, City Auditor
Attachments: 1. Council Memorandum, 2. Draft Contract, 3. Certificate of Interested Parties
TITLE

Consider a memorandum/resolution approving a professional services agreement with McConnell & Jones, LLP for audit services.

SUMMARY

AGENDA ITEM

Approve a professional services agreement with McConnell & Jones, LLP for audit services.

ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT

City Auditor/City Attorney

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

On October 9, 2016, the City began advertising a Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”), in which the City sought responses from qualified firms of certified public accountants interested in examining the City’s administrative and internal controls for the fiscal years 2006 to 2015. On November 4, 2016, the City received and opened responses from eleven firms. A committee consisting of Councilmembers Kilpatrick, Fleming and Young, Dr. Jim Anderson, Richard Banta, David Cole, Kathy Harkin, Gregory Hughes and Butch Menking evaluated all eleven responses and presented its findings to the City Council on November 15, 2016. At that meeting, the City Council selected the top three most highly qualified firms to interview. On November 22, 2016, the Council interviewed representatives from the three selected firms, identified McConnell & Jones, LLP as the most qualified audit firm, and instructed the Audit Advisory Committee (Councilmembers Kilpatrick, Fleming and Young) and staff to enter into negotiations with that firm.

In early December, the Audit Advisory Committee began working to finalize the scope of the audit work, and briefed the City Council on its progress on December 6, 2016. At that meeting, the Committee requested that each councilmember provide the committee with three significant issues that should be investigated by the audit firm. Through a series of six meetings, the Committee continued to work with staff and the audit firm on refining the scope of the audit, taking into account each of the council and citizen-identified significant issues. During that same time frame, the City Council discussed the issues and gave guidan...

Click here for full text