Legistar header
                                                         
File #: PH-23-027    Version: 1 Name: Demolition by Neglect Ordinance
Type: Ordinance/Public Hearing Status: Passed
File created: 3/27/2023 In control: City Council
On agenda: 4/25/2023 Final action: 4/25/2023
Title: HOLD a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending Killeen Code of Ordinances Sec. 31-833. - Demolition by neglect.
Sponsors: Development Services, Finance Department
Attachments: 1. Minutes, 2. Ordinance, 3. Presentation
Title

HOLD a public hearing and consider an ordinance amending Killeen Code of Ordinances Sec. 31-833. - Demolition by neglect.

Summary

DATE: April 18, 2023

TO: Kent Cagle, City Manager

FROM: Edwin Revell, Executive Director of Development Services

SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Chapter 31 - Demolition by Neglect

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

Killeen Code of Ordinances Sec. 31-833 outlines provisions regarding demolition by neglect of properties located within the Historical Overlay District (HOD). "Demolition by neglect" refers to the practice of allowing a building to deteriorate to the point that demolition may become necessary. The intent of these provisions is to prevent property owners from allowing their historic buildings to deteriorate to the point that they can no longer be restored. A finding of demolition by neglect means that the property owner, by neglecting and/or failing to maintain the building, has allowed the building to fall into such a serious state of disrepair that, if not addressed, the building may need to be demolished.

Examples of issues that may lead to a finding of demolition by neglect include: roof leaks, cracked foundations, broken windows, deteriorated structural members, or any disrepair that allows water intrusion into the building. As written, Sec. 31-833 requires the Heritage Preservation Board (HPB) to make a finding of demolition by neglect before code enforcement proceedings can begin. If approved, the proposed amendment would allow the Heritage Preservation Officer (HPO) to make findings of demolition by neglect.

THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council has three (3) alternatives:
* Do not approve the ordinance;
* Approve the ordinance with amendments; or
* Approve the ordinance as presented.

Which alternative is recommended? Why?

Staff recommends approval of the ordinance as presented. This change would allow Development Services staff to address deteriorating buildings within the HOD more quickly ...

Click here for full text