Legistar header
                                                         
File #: RS-22-122    Version: 1 Name: Reject Bid No. 22-25 Wayfinding Signage Improvements Project
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 8/15/2022 In control: City Council
On agenda: 9/13/2022 Final action: 9/13/2022
Title: Consider a memorandum/resolution rejecting Bid No. 22-25 for the Wayfinding Signage Improvements Project.
Sponsors: Aviation Department
Attachments: 1. Letter of Recommendation, 2. Presentation
Title

Consider a memorandum/resolution rejecting Bid No. 22-25 for the Wayfinding Signage Improvements Project.

Summary

DATE: September 6, 2022

TO: Kent Cagle, City Manager

FROM: Mike Wilson, Executive Director of Aviation

SUBJECT: Reject Bid for Bid No. 22-25 Wayfinding Signage Improvements Project

BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS:

On July 13, 2021, The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved a new Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application at Killeen-Fort Hood Regional Airport to collect PFC revenues from the Airlines for approved projects in this application. One of the projects in the approved application is the Wayfinding Improvements Project in the amount of $300,000. This project is in our CIP for 2021. It will include the design, procurement, and replacement of existing LED message board and add additional signage.

The City advertised the Wayfinding Signage Improvements Project bid on May 19 and 26, 2022. Advertising appeared in the local newspaper as well as the City's website. Additionally, it was advertised on multiple statewide electronic bidding sites. A pre-bid meeting was held on May 26, 2022 with two (2) general contractors attending.

On July 6, 2022, one (1) bid was received from Native American Services Corps (NASCO). The results were as follows:


Vendor
NASCO
Base Bid
$486,000.00
Deductive Alternate 1
-$86,631.00

A thorough review of this bid package was completed by the airport's consultant and staff. The bid came in higher than what the FAA has approved for this project.

Therefore, the consultant and staff's recommendation is to reject the bid.

THE ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Alternatives considered: (1) Award bid, or (2) reject the bid.


Which alternative is recommended? Why?

Staff recommends alternative 2. The bid came in higher than what the FAA approved for this project. FAA recommended to re-bid project.

CONFORMITY TO CITY POLICY:

Rejection of bid is allowed by the competitive bid process per Local Government Code ...

Click here for full text